“If the United States deploys any ground troops into Iran, that Iran would set them on fire.”
Michael Barbaro
0:29“If the United States deploys any ground troops into Iran, that Iran would set them on fire.”
Michael Barbaro
0:29Trump claims the US and Iran are in productive talks to end their war — Iran flatly denies it, and NYT national security correspondent David Sanger explains why both sides are lying. After striking 11,000 targets without triggering regime change, Trump needs a diplomatic exit, but Iran is deliberately stalling: every week of war drives up oil prices, rattles markets, and erodes Trump's political standing, giving Iran compounding leverage at the negotiating table. The deeper problem is structural — the US attacked Iran twice *during* previous negotiations, Iran's parliament is threatening to "set on fire" any US ground troops, and the issues now on the table have exploded far beyond the 2015 nuclear deal framework into questions of Iran's basic survival as a state. If you want to understand why this conflict has no clean ending in sight — and why it could end up incentivizing Iran to go nuclear — this is the clearest 30-minute briefing available.
Michael Barbaro introduces The Daily and sets up the episode's central topic: President Trump's desire for negotiations with Iran versus Iran's reluctance.
No quotes extracted for this segment.